|
|
The International Desalination & Water Reuse Quarterly industry website
|
|
| Subscribe | |
| About us Feedback Register Contact Advertise Links Cookies | |
Site Sponsor» What is RSS? » List of feeds » Desalination news on your website? |
Groups appeal Huntington Beach desalination permitThe appellants, the Surfrider Foundation, Residents for Responsible Desalination, Orange County Coastkeeper and Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation, believe the board failed to interpret and apply the law properly to protect marine life. The board can accept or deny the appeal and must respond within 120 days. The WQCB first approved the 189,000 m³/d project's permit in 2006 enabling the desalination facility to operate in unison with the co-located Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS). The amended permit, approved on 10 February 2012, allows the project to operate in a "stand-alone" mode when the powerplant is temporarily shut down; or when HBGS is operating but its seawater discharge volumes are insufficient to meet the project's 480,000 m³/d intake requirements. The project's stand-alone operations are regulated under California Water Code - Section 13142.5(b), which requires new industrial facilities using seawater for processing to use the best available site, design, technology and mitigation feasible to minimize intake and mortality of marine life. In approving the Huntington Beach desalination facility's temporary stand-alone operation, the WQCB found the project fully complied with the code. The appeal disputes this. "The Poseidon proposal, and the WQCB's approval of the facility flies in the face of the state's efforts to eliminate marine life mortality from industrial withdrawals of seawater," stated Joe Geever, Surfrider Foundation's water programs manager. "We're certain Poseidon's plan does not comply with the law, and will not comply with the state's pending guidelines on how to best locate and design seawater desalination facilities." The co-petitioners believe there is no choice but to challenge the permit under existing laws until the state's policy on ocean desalination is completed later this year. "We believe that ocean desalination is too expensive and too damaging to the environment and, as such, it should be an 'option of last resort,'" said Garry Brown, of OC Coastkeeper. "Before saddling the ratepayers with ocean desalinated water from an out-of-state, private, for-profit water purveyor, local water agencies should prioritize other less expensive and multi-benefit alternatives." Posted on 19 March 2012
Get D&WR's news every week in our free newsletter. Register now - that's free too!
Source: Desalination & Water Reuse
This story is tagged as:
California | Desalination | Environment | Legislation | Seawater | USA Click on a keyword to see more stories on that topic Share this
© Faversham House Group Ltd 2012.
Desalination & Water Reuse news articles may be copied or forwarded for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.
|
Register Now!You are not
logged in » Log in here  Why not register for your free newsletter with all the week's news? Latest News» IDA Conference Report» Mega-ton project symposium set for Tokyo in November » Aquatech increases Pennsylvania oil & gas resources » ERI providing energy-recovery in Ghana and Oman » Huntingdon Beach councillors oppose desalination plan Related Stories» Napolitano seeks to reauthorize US desalination act » Santa Cruz prepares for desalination EIR release » West Basin looks to hire out its desalination test facility » Pacific Institute reports on desalination energy use » HTI joins Stanford University board for ReNUWIt program » AMTA to bid for 2015 IDA World Congress » GRA web seminar to look at California salt plans » Chinese visitors for West Basin water-reuse plant » Industrial WateReuse conference to be held in Long Beach |
Send to a friend
Link to this page
Comment| Subscribe | |
| About us Feedback Register Contact Advertise Links Cookies | |
Cookies